In our Paris to Rome EV duel, the Tesla Model 3 Performance beats the Tesla Model Y Performance by 8 minutes, completing the 1423km route in 14h 36min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on August 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Tesla Model 3 Performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Tesla Model 3 Performance
- Total time: 14h 36min (8 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 1h 9min
- Energy: ~252 kWh
- Distance: 1423km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Tesla Model 3 Performance |
Tesla Model Y Performance |
| Travel time |
14h 36min |
14h 44min |
| Charging time: |
1h 9min |
1h 10min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~256 kWh |
~257 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Tesla Model 3 Performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Aire de Mâcon, Saint-Albain (20 min, 15% → 75%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Les Iles de Brissogne Sud, Brissogne (15 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 3:
Giornali Lotto Bar Sport, Guardamiglio (18 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 4:
Arno Ovest, Reggello (16 min, 10% → 65%)
- Arrival: Rome
Tesla Model Y Performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aire de La Ferté, Saint-Ambreuil (11 min, 15% → 58%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Shopping Etrembières, Étrembières (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Les Iles de Brissogne Sud, Brissogne (10 min, 17% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Pit Stop Café, Trezzano sul Naviglio (11 min, 12% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Hotel Real Fini Baia Del Re, Modena (14 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 6:
Area Servizio Badia al Pino Ovest, Badia al Pino (14 min, 10% → 61%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Tesla Model 3 Performance Won
The Tesla Model 3 Performance achieved a 8-minute advantage over Tesla Model Y Performance on this 1423km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 9min vs 1h 10min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~252 kWh vs ~260 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons