In our Paris to Rome EV duel, the Tesla Model Y Long-Range beats the Tesla Model X 2023 by 85 minutes, completing the 1423km route in 14h 20min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Tesla Model X 2023's 460km range doesn't beat the Tesla Model Y Long-Range's 426km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Tesla Model Y Long-Range needs only 4 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Tesla Model Y Long-Range
- Total time: 14h 20min (85 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 52min
- Energy: ~251 kWh
- Distance: 1423km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Tesla Model X 2023 |
Tesla Model Y Long-Range |
| Travel time |
15h 45min |
14h 20min |
| Charging time: |
2h 14min |
52min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~256 kWh |
~256 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Tesla Model X 2023 Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Mâcon Supercharger, Sancé (27 min, 14% → 72%)
-
Stop 2:
Tesla Supercharger, Pollein (15 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 3:
Muggiano Ovest, Milano (39 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Hotel Real Fini Baia Del Re, Modena (24 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 5:
Area di Servizio Fabro Ovest, Fabro (29 min, 10% → 41%)
- Arrival: Rome
Tesla Model Y Long-Range Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aire de Bourg Teyssonge, Jasseron (12 min, 13% → 58%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Les Iles de Brissogne Sud, Brissogne (12 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
Giornali Lotto Bar Sport, Guardamiglio (15 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 4:
Osteria De'Giusti, Ciliegi (13 min, 10% → 60%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Tesla Model Y Long-Range Won
The Tesla Model Y Long-Range achieved a 85-minute advantage over Tesla Model X 2023 on this 1423km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 52min vs 2h 14min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~251 kWh vs ~294 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons