In our Paris to Sofia EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the smart #1 Pro+ by 144 minutes, completing the 2162km route in 21h 42min. The key advantage? 8 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 20, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 13 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 21h 42min (144 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 33min
- Energy: ~353 kWh
- Distance: 2162km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
smart #1 Pro+ |
| Travel time |
21h 42min |
24h 6min |
| Charging time: |
1h 33min |
3h 7min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
13 |
| Energy used |
~389 kWh |
~390 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Engie Aire de Brumath Ouest (13 min, 12% → 68%)
-
Stop 2:
Electra Jimmy's Fun Park (14 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Eisentratten (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Shell (19 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 5:
OMV A1 (34 min, 10% → 86%)
- Arrival: Sofia
smart #1 Pro+ Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Fastned Aire de Valmy Orbeval (10 min, 37% → 62%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's (16 min, 13% → 62%)
-
Stop 3:
Aral Tankstelle Karlsruher Straße (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 4:
Aral Tankstelle (14 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Auto & Service PIA Landsberger Straße (12 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 6:
Walserberg Süd (10 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 7:
Hotel Mühlbacherhof (10 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Avtocestno počivališče Radovljica Jug (12 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 9:
IONITY MOL Tankstelle (15 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 10:
Odmorište Novska Jug (21 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 11:
OMV Martinci (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 12:
JP Putevi Srbije (22 min, 11% → 72%)
-
Stop 13:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (23 min, 10% → 60%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 144-minute advantage over smart #1 Pro+ on this 2162km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 13 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 33min vs 3h 7min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~353 kWh vs ~394 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons