In our Paris to Sofia EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the VW ID.4 Pro 2023 by 138 minutes, completing the 2162km route in 21h 42min. The key advantage? 6 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 21h 42min (138 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 33min
- Energy: ~353 kWh
- Distance: 2162km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
VW ID.4 Pro 2023 |
| Travel time |
21h 42min |
24h 0min |
| Charging time: |
1h 33min |
3h 2min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~389 kWh |
~389 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Engie Aire de Brumath Ouest (13 min, 12% → 68%)
-
Stop 2:
Electra Jimmy's Fun Park (14 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Eisentratten (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Shell (19 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 5:
OMV A1 (34 min, 10% → 86%)
- Arrival: Sofia
VW ID.4 Pro 2023 Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aire de Metz Saint-Privat (17 min, 22% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
Q1 Tankstelle (14 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 3:
Aral Tankstelle (14 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 4:
Auto & Service PIA Landsberger Straße (14 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 5:
Smatrics Lidl (13 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 6:
Gewerbepark Pöllan (20 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY MOL Tankstelle (15 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 8:
Odmorište Novska Jug (20 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 9:
OMV Martinci (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 10:
JP Putevi Srbije (21 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 11:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (24 min, 10% → 52%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 138-minute advantage over VW ID.4 Pro 2023 on this 2162km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 33min vs 3h 2min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~353 kWh vs ~378 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons