In our Paris to Sofia EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the XPENG G6 RWD Long Range 2025 by 35 minutes, completing the 2162km route in 21h 42min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 21h 42min (35 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 33min
- Energy: ~353 kWh
- Distance: 2162km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
XPENG G6 RWD Long Range 2025 |
| Travel time |
21h 42min |
22h 17min |
| Charging time: |
1h 33min |
1h 38min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~389 kWh |
~388 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Engie Aire de Brumath Ouest (13 min, 12% → 68%)
-
Stop 2:
Electra Jimmy's Fun Park (14 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Eisentratten (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Shell (19 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 5:
OMV A1 (34 min, 10% → 86%)
- Arrival: Sofia
XPENG G6 RWD Long Range 2025 Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aire de Longeville-lès-Saint-Avold Sud (12 min, 11% → 83%)
-
Stop 2:
Industriestraße (10 min, 10% → 79%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY L'Osteria (10 min, 17% → 81%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Avtocestno počivališče Radovljica Jug (10 min, 12% → 77%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (11 min, 27% → 82%)
-
Stop 6:
OMV Martinci (21 min, 10% → 86%)
-
Stop 7:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (24 min, 10% → 51%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 35-minute advantage over XPENG G6 RWD Long Range 2025 on this 2162km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 33min vs 1h 38min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~353 kWh vs ~412 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons