In our Paris to Sofia EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the XPENG G9 AWD Performance 2025 by 29 minutes, completing the 2160km route in 21h 29min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 21h 29min (29 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 22min
- Energy: ~336 kWh
- Distance: 2160km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
XPENG G9 AWD Performance 2025 |
| Travel time |
21h 29min |
21h 58min |
| Charging time: |
1h 22min |
1h 33min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~389 kWh |
~390 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Engie Aire de Brumath Ouest (11 min, 17% → 64%)
-
Stop 2:
Electra Jimmy's Fun Park (12 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Eisentratten (12 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (17 min, 10% → 74%)
-
Stop 5:
OMV A1 (30 min, 10% → 82%)
- Arrival: Sofia
XPENG G9 AWD Performance 2025 Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aire de Longeville-lès-Saint-Avold Sud (11 min, 16% → 79%)
-
Stop 2:
EnBW HyperNetz (10 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 3:
Walserberg Süd (10 min, 10% → 73%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Eisentratten (10 min, 43% → 89%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Shell (10 min, 18% → 78%)
-
Stop 6:
OMV Martinci (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 7:
JP Putevi Srbije (32 min, 17% → 97%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 29-minute advantage over XPENG G9 AWD Performance 2025 on this 2160km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 22min vs 1h 33min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~336 kWh vs ~460 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons