In our Paris to Sofia EV duel, the BMW i5 eDrive40 beats the Audi Q4 Sportback 40 e-tron by 74 minutes, completing the 2163km route in 22h 43min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The BMW i5 eDrive40 needs only 9 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
BMW i5 eDrive40
- Total time: 22h 43min (74 min faster)
- Charging stops: 9
- Charging time: 2h 1min
- Energy: ~372 kWh
- Distance: 2163km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q4 Sportback 40 e-tron |
BMW i5 eDrive40 |
| Travel time |
23h 57min |
22h 43min |
| Charging time: |
2h 59min |
2h 1min |
| Charging stops: |
11 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~389 kWh |
~389 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q4 Sportback 40 e-tron Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aire de Metz Saint-Privat (17 min, 22% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
Q1 Tankstelle (14 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 3:
Aral Tankstelle (13 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 4:
Auto & Service PIA Landsberger Straße (12 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 5:
Walserberg Süd (14 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 6:
Gewerbepark Pöllan (20 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY MOL Tankstelle (15 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 8:
Odmorište Novska Jug (19 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 9:
OMV Martinci (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 10:
JP Putevi Srbije (21 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 11:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (24 min, 10% → 52%)
- Arrival: Sofia
BMW i5 eDrive40 Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Fastned Aire de Keskastel Ouest (10 min, 11% → 51%)
-
Stop 2:
P+M Mitfahrerparkplatz A8 Karlsbad (12 min, 18% → 60%)
-
Stop 3:
Aral Tankstelle (11 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 4:
Smatrics Lidl (12 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Avtocestno počivališče Radovljica Jug (11 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (23 min, 10% → 74%)
-
Stop 7:
OMV Martinci (10 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 8:
JP Putevi Srbije (10 min, 23% → 55%)
-
Stop 9:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (22 min, 10% → 47%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the BMW i5 eDrive40 Won
The BMW i5 eDrive40 achieved a 74-minute advantage over Audi Q4 Sportback 40 e-tron on this 2163km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 9 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 1min vs 2h 59min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~372 kWh vs ~386 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons