In our Paris to Sofia EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Volvo EX90 Twin Motor by 52 minutes, completing the 2163km route in 22h 9min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 22h 9min (52 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 45min
- Energy: ~397 kWh
- Distance: 2163km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Volvo EX90 Twin Motor |
| Travel time |
22h 9min |
23h 1min |
| Charging time: |
1h 45min |
2h 36min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~389 kWh |
~391 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Fastned Aire de Keskastel Ouest (11 min, 15% → 64%)
-
Stop 2:
EnBW HyperNetz (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
Aral Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Eisentratten (16 min, 14% → 74%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (16 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 6:
OMV Martinci (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 7:
JP Putevi Srbije (31 min, 18% → 88%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Fastned Aire de Keskastel Ouest (10 min, 13% → 45%)
-
Stop 2:
P+M Mitfahrerparkplatz A8 Karlsbad (10 min, 13% → 43%)
-
Stop 3:
EnBW Autohof Seligweiler (10 min, 12% → 45%)
-
Stop 4:
Hofoldinger Forst Süd (11 min, 11% → 49%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Wagrainer Straße (10 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Avtocestno počivališče Radovljica Jug (14 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 7:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (30 min, 10% → 73%)
-
Stop 8:
OMV Martinci (10 min, 10% → 38%)
-
Stop 9:
JP Putevi Srbije (51 min, 15% → 90%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 52-minute advantage over Volvo EX90 Twin Motor on this 2163km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 45min vs 2h 36min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~397 kWh vs ~492 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons