In our Paris to Sofia EV duel, the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi e-tron GT by 73 minutes, completing the 2162km route in 22h 15min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 8 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 22h 15min (73 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 1h 51min
- Energy: ~388 kWh
- Distance: 2162km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi e-tron GT |
| Travel time |
22h 15min |
23h 28min |
| Charging time: |
1h 51min |
2h 44min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~389 kWh |
~390 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Fastned Aire de Keskastel Ouest (10 min, 13% → 57%)
-
Stop 2:
P+M Mitfahrerparkplatz A8 Karlsbad (10 min, 24% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
Aral Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Smatrics Lidl (10 min, 12% → 56%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Avtocestno počivališče Radovljica Jug (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (17 min, 11% → 73%)
-
Stop 7:
OMV Martinci (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 8:
JP Putevi Srbije (34 min, 18% → 90%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Audi e-tron GT Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aire de Metz Saint-Privat (14 min, 20% → 64%)
-
Stop 2:
Q1 Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 3:
Industriestraße (11 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 4:
Esso Tankstelle Arnulfstraße (11 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 5:
Smatrics Lidl (16 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Avtocestno počivališče Radovljica Jug (15 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 7:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (31 min, 10% → 85%)
-
Stop 8:
OMV Martinci (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 9:
OMV A1 (18 min, 24% → 73%)
-
Stop 10:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (28 min, 10% → 53%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 73-minute advantage over Audi e-tron GT on this 2162km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 51min vs 2h 44min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~388 kWh vs ~484 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons