In our Paris to Vienna EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 46 minutes, completing the 1238km route in 11h 38min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 11h 38min (46 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 33min
- Energy: ~202 kWh
- Distance: 1238km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
11h 38min |
12h 24min |
| Charging time: |
33min |
1h 16min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~223 kWh |
~223 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's, Ramstein-Miesenbach (10 min, 17% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Autohof Herrieden, Herrieden (12 min, 13% → 63%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Tankstelle, Suben (11 min, 10% → 59%)
- Arrival: Vienna
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aire de Metz Saint-Privat, Saint-Privat-la-Montagne (10 min, 12% → 48%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's, Ramstein-Miesenbach (11 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 3:
Bonfelder Straße, Bad Rappenau (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 4:
McDonald's, Aurach (10 min, 13% → 48%)
-
Stop 5:
Total Tankstelle, Brunn (14 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
Shell Tankstelle, Suben (11 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 7:
Electra Stop & Go Pendlerparkplatz Amstetten West, Amstetten (10 min, 10% → 47%)
- Arrival: Vienna
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 46-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1238km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 33min vs 1h 16min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~202 kWh vs ~205 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons