In our Paris to Vilnius EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 by 59 minutes, completing the 2081km route in 20h 30min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 20h 30min (59 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 26min
- Energy: ~340 kWh
- Distance: 2081km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 |
| Travel time |
20h 30min |
21h 29min |
| Charging time: |
1h 26min |
2h 24min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~375 kWh |
~375 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Aachener Land Süd (10 min, 21% → 62%)
-
Stop 2:
Fastned Rastplatz Fuchsgrund Süd (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
EnBW Schnellladepark (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Rogoziniec (12 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Niesułków (20 min, 10% → 79%)
-
Stop 6:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (23 min, 10% → 53%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Aachener Land Süd (23 min, 14% → 66%)
-
Stop 2:
Fastned Rastplatz Fuchsgrund Süd (15 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Irxleben (15 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 4:
Autohaus König (20 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Targowa Górka (17 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 6:
MOP Mogiły (31 min, 10% → 77%)
-
Stop 7:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (23 min, 10% → 56%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 59-minute advantage over Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 on this 2081km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 26min vs 2h 24min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~340 kWh vs ~362 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons