In our Paris to Vilnius EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the VW ID. Buzz Pro LR by 113 minutes, completing the 2081km route in 20h 30min. The key advantage? 6 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 12 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 20h 30min (113 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 26min
- Energy: ~340 kWh
- Distance: 2081km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
VW ID. Buzz Pro LR |
| Travel time |
20h 30min |
22h 23min |
| Charging time: |
1h 26min |
3h 7min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
12 |
| Energy used |
~375 kWh |
~376 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Aachener Land Süd (10 min, 21% → 62%)
-
Stop 2:
Fastned Rastplatz Fuchsgrund Süd (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
EnBW Schnellladepark (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Rogoziniec (12 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Niesułków (20 min, 10% → 79%)
-
Stop 6:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (23 min, 10% → 53%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
VW ID. Buzz Pro LR Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger ibis Styles (11 min, 18% → 48%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Tankstelle (11 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Lichtendorf Süd (13 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 4:
Fastned Rastplatz Fuchsgrund Süd (14 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 5:
Fastned Rastplatz Uhry Süd (11 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 6:
EnBW Schnellladepark (11 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 7:
Autohaus König (11 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 8:
MOP Rogoziniec (15 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 9:
MOP Lądek (12 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 10:
IONITY Niesułków (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 11:
Biedronka Fabryczna (36 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 12:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (32 min, 10% → 71%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 113-minute advantage over VW ID. Buzz Pro LR on this 2081km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 12 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 26min vs 3h 7min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~340 kWh vs ~460 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons