In our Paris to Vilnius EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron beats the Ford Capri Extended Range by 70 minutes, completing the 2083km route in 20h 20min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron needs only 6 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron
- Total time: 20h 20min (70 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 13min
- Energy: ~291 kWh
- Distance: 2083km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron |
Ford Capri Extended Range |
| Travel time |
20h 20min |
21h 30min |
| Charging time: |
1h 13min |
2h 19min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~375 kWh |
~375 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aral Tankstelle Aachener Straße 1100 (14 min, 12% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
Shell Tankstelle Hämelerwald (10 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
Aral Autohof Niederlehme (10 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Targowa Górka (11 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 5:
Factory Annopol (10 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 6:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (18 min, 10% → 52%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
Ford Capri Extended Range Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Shell Eupen (15 min, 11% → 56%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Euro Rastpark (14 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Tankstelle Hämelerwald (16 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 4:
Circle K Autohof Ferch (15 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Rogoziniec (11 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 6:
MOP Lądek (20 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 7:
Biedronka Fabryczna (26 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 8:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (22 min, 10% → 61%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron achieved a 70-minute advantage over Ford Capri Extended Range on this 2083km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 13min vs 2h 19min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~291 kWh vs ~341 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons