In our Paris to Vilnius EV duel, the Audi e-tron GT beats the Audi Q4 40 e-tron by 11 minutes, completing the 2087km route in 21h 46min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q4 40 e-tron's 416km range doesn't beat the Audi e-tron GT's 389km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Audi e-tron GT needs only 9 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi e-tron GT
- Total time: 21h 46min (11 min faster)
- Charging stops: 9
- Charging time: 2h 26min
- Energy: ~467 kWh
- Distance: 2087km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q4 40 e-tron |
Audi e-tron GT |
| Travel time |
21h 57min |
21h 46min |
| Charging time: |
2h 42min |
2h 26min |
| Charging stops: |
10 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~376 kWh |
~375 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q4 40 e-tron Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Bierset (11 min, 15% → 47%)
-
Stop 2:
OBI (17 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Rastplatz Fuchsgrund Süd (17 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Irxleben (17 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Autohaus König (10 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 6:
MOP Rogoziniec (13 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 7:
MOP Lądek (11 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Niesułków (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 9:
Biedronka Fabryczna (28 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 10:
MOP Rudniki Południe (28 min, 10% → 66%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
Audi e-tron GT Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY ibis Styles (13 min, 21% → 64%)
-
Stop 2:
OBI (14 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Rastplatz Fuchsgrund Süd (10 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 4:
Fastned Rastplatz Uhry Süd (16 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 5:
Aral Autohof Niederlehme (10 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 6:
MOP Rogoziniec (10 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 7:
MOP Lądek (20 min, 10% → 73%)
-
Stop 8:
Biedronka Fabryczna (33 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 9:
Kaufland (20 min, 10% → 65%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
Why the Audi e-tron GT Won
The Audi e-tron GT achieved a 11-minute advantage over Audi Q4 40 e-tron on this 2087km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 9 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 26min vs 2h 42min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons