In our Prague to Athens EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 22 minutes, completing the 1997km route in 22h 9min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on August 10, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 10 charging stops compared to 12 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 22h 9min (22 min faster)
- Charging stops: 10
- Charging time: 3h 14min
- Energy: ~315 kWh
- Distance: 1997km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
22h 31min |
22h 9min |
| Charging time: |
3h 19min |
3h 14min |
| Charging stops: |
12 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~359 kWh |
~360 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Shell Ladná směr Bratislava (11 min, 23% → 56%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Győr (16 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (22 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 4:
OMV Backa Topola jug (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 5:
OMV smer Beograd (18 min, 14% → 57%)
-
Stop 6:
Gazprom (26 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 7:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (21 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 8:
Makpetrol A1 (17 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 9:
Makpetrol (14 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 10:
Skotina dir Athen (23 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 11:
Shell (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 12:
Atalanti Süd (11 min, 19% → 53%)
- Arrival: Athens
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Shell Ladná směr Bratislava (11 min, 23% → 56%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Győr (23 min, 10% → 74%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (27 min, 10% → 81%)
-
Stop 4:
OMV smer Beograd (42 min, 10% → 98%)
-
Stop 5:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (20 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 6:
Makpetrol A1 (16 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 7:
Makpetrol (13 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 8:
Skotina dir Athen (21 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 9:
Shell (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 10:
Atalanti Süd (11 min, 19% → 53%)
- Arrival: Athens
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 22-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 1997km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 10 stops vs 12 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 3h 14min vs 3h 19min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~315 kWh vs ~318 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons