In our Prague to Bucharest EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance by 10 minutes, completing the 1343km route in 13h 55min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 13h 55min (10 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 40min
- Energy: ~219 kWh
- Distance: 1343km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
13h 55min |
14h 5min |
| Charging time: |
40min |
51min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~242 kWh |
~242 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Győr (16 min, 24% → 78%)
-
Stop 2:
Petrom DN7 (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului stanga (13 min, 10% → 67%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Mosonmagyaróvár Süd (10 min, 21% → 51%)
-
Stop 2:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (11 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 3:
OMV DN69 (12 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 4:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului stanga (Truck) (18 min, 10% → 76%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 10-minute advantage over Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance on this 1343km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 40min vs 51min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~219 kWh vs ~241 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons