In our Prague to Dublin EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the smart #1 Pro by 58 minutes, completing the 1790km route in 21h 34min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on August 31, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 21h 34min (58 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 7min
- Energy: ~292 kWh
- Distance: 1790km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
smart #1 Pro |
| Travel time |
21h 34min |
22h 32min |
| Charging time: |
1h 7min |
2h 5min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~322 kWh |
~320 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Autohof Elsinger Höhe (13 min, 12% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
Fastned De Beerze (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Oostendse Baan (13 min, 21% → 72%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Poplars Garden Centre (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Mountain Park Hotel (10 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 6:
Sir John Rogerson's Quay (10 min, 10% → 18%)
- Arrival: Dublin
smart #1 Pro Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
EnBW Schnellladepark (14 min, 18% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Autohof Elsinger Höhe (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 3:
Aral Tankstelle Westfalendamm (11 min, 12% → 57%)
-
Stop 4:
Fastned Oeienbosch (10 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 5:
Lukoil Kortrijksesteenweg (10 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Eurotunnel Flexiplus Lounge (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Village Hotel (10 min, 16% → 55%)
-
Stop 8:
Moto Toddington Northbound (10 min, 16% → 55%)
-
Stop 9:
IONITY Village Hotel (10 min, 13% → 53%)
-
Stop 10:
Supercharger Mountain Park Hotel (20 min, 15% → 80%)
-
Stop 11:
Sir John Rogerson's Quay (10 min, 10% → 27%)
- Arrival: Dublin
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 58-minute advantage over smart #1 Pro on this 1790km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 7min vs 2h 5min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~292 kWh vs ~351 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons