In our Prague to Helsinki EV duel, the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge beats the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 by 8 minutes, completing the 1688km route in 23h 19min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge needs only 9 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge
- Total time: 23h 19min (8 min faster)
- Charging stops: 9
- Charging time: 2h 26min
- Energy: ~279 kWh
- Distance: 1688km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
23h 27min |
23h 19min |
| Charging time: |
2h 34min |
2h 26min |
| Charging stops: |
10 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~304 kWh |
~303 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Citronex (23 min, 22% → 81%)
-
Stop 2:
MOP Guzew Południe (13 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 3:
McDonald's (35 min, 10% → 94%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Rudniki Południe (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 5:
Norfa XL (10 min, 10% → 25%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Circle K (14 min, 24% → 64%)
-
Stop 7:
Cafe Baltica (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Circle K Ādaži (16 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 9:
Rimi Niidu (11 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 10:
Neste Pääsküla (10 min, 10% → 41%)
- Arrival: Helsinki
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Orlen Michałowice Południe (18 min, 14% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
MOP Guzew Południe (14 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Biedronka Fabryczna (34 min, 10% → 82%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Rudniki Południe (13 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 5:
Norfa XL (10 min, 10% → 23%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Circle K (16 min, 22% → 67%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY (16 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 8:
Neste (14 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 9:
Krooning (11 min, 10% → 46%)
- Arrival: Helsinki
Why the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Won
The Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge achieved a 8-minute advantage over Renault 5 E-Tech 150 on this 1688km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 9 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 26min vs 2h 34min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons