In our Prague to Madrid EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Tesla Model S 2023 by 227 minutes, completing the 2210km route in 21h 59min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 21h 59min (227 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 17min
- Energy: ~361 kWh
- Distance: 2210km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Tesla Model S 2023 |
| Travel time |
21h 59min |
25h 46min |
| Charging time: |
1h 17min |
4h 0min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~398 kWh |
~400 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
ATU (10 min, 14% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Zone de trois Couronnes (13 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Lieu dit Le Mont (19 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Super U (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Aire de Labenne Ouest (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Calle Herreros (10 min, 10% → 54%)
- Arrival: Madrid
Tesla Model S 2023 Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Oberpfälzer Alb Nord (10 min, 49% → 57%)
-
Stop 2:
24-ARAL Autohof (31 min, 12% → 67%)
-
Stop 3:
Aire de la Porte d’Alsace Nord (15 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Hôtel Akena Besançon (17 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 5:
Fastned Lieu dit Le Mont (26 min, 10% → 33%)
-
Stop 6:
Aire des Volcans d'Auvergne Ouest (30 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 7:
Aire du Manoire (26 min, 10% → 38%)
-
Stop 8:
Aire Fontbelleau Paris Bayonne (37 min, 10% → 73%)
-
Stop 9:
Avia (20 min, 10% → 28%)
-
Stop 10:
Supercharger Hotelandgo Arasur (10 min, 10% → 36%)
-
Stop 11:
Supercharger Hotel Landa (18 min, 17% → 60%)
- Arrival: Madrid
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 227-minute advantage over Tesla Model S 2023 on this 2210km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 17min vs 4h 0min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~361 kWh vs ~416 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons