In our Prague to Riga EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance by 4 minutes, completing the 1285km route in 14h 56min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance's 524km range doesn't beat the Audi Q6 e-tron performance's 512km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 14h 56min (4 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 1h 5min
- Energy: ~236 kWh
- Distance: 1285km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
14h 56min |
15h 0min |
| Charging time: |
1h 5min |
1h 12min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~231 kWh |
~232 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Bar Mettos (16 min, 27% → 71%)
-
Stop 2:
HPC Autogala Volvo (36 min, 10% → 90%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Circle K (13 min, 10% → 66%)
- Arrival: Riga
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Bar Mettos (10 min, 25% → 51%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Niesułków (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell (30 min, 20% → 81%)
-
Stop 4:
Norfa XL (10 min, 10% → 18%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Circle K (12 min, 17% → 68%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 4-minute advantage over Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance on this 1285km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 5min vs 1h 12min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons