In our Prague to Riga EV duel, the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 by 48 minutes, completing the 1290km route in 15h 0min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 15h 0min (48 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 12min
- Energy: ~231 kWh
- Distance: 1290km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
15h 0min |
15h 48min |
| Charging time: |
1h 12min |
1h 54min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~232 kWh |
~232 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Bar Mettos (10 min, 25% → 51%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Niesułków (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell (30 min, 20% → 81%)
-
Stop 4:
Norfa XL (10 min, 10% → 18%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Circle K (12 min, 17% → 68%)
- Arrival: Riga
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Citronex (23 min, 22% → 81%)
-
Stop 2:
MOP Guzew Południe (15 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
Biedronka Fabryczna (30 min, 10% → 87%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Rudniki Południe (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 5:
Norfa XL (10 min, 10% → 25%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Circle K (14 min, 24% → 64%)
-
Stop 7:
Cafe Baltica (10 min, 10% → 41%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 48-minute advantage over Renault 5 E-Tech 150 on this 1290km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 12min vs 1h 54min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons