In our Prague to Rome EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Tesla Model 3 Performance by 19 minutes, completing the 1281km route in 12h 45min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 1, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 12h 45min (19 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 34min
- Energy: ~209 kWh
- Distance: 1281km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Tesla Model 3 Performance |
| Travel time |
12h 45min |
13h 4min |
| Charging time: |
34min |
56min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~231 kWh |
~231 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Shell Tankstelle (12 min, 12% → 65%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Affi (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Ristorante Goyo (12 min, 12% → 65%)
- Arrival: Rome
Tesla Model 3 Performance Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aral Tankstelle Garmischer Straße (10 min, 14% → 53%)
-
Stop 2:
Hofer (12 min, 20% → 62%)
-
Stop 3:
Garda Ovest (14 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 4:
Ristorante Goyo (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 5:
Area di Servizio Fabro Ovest (10 min, 16% → 54%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 19-minute advantage over Tesla Model 3 Performance on this 1281km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 34min vs 56min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~209 kWh vs ~227 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons