In our Prague to Rome EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 by 36 minutes, completing the 1279km route in 12h 41min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 12h 41min (36 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 37min
- Energy: ~199 kWh
- Distance: 1279km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 |
| Travel time |
12h 41min |
13h 17min |
| Charging time: |
37min |
1h 9min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~230 kWh |
~231 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Shell Tankstelle (10 min, 17% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Hofer (10 min, 49% → 77%)
-
Stop 3:
Cantagallo Ovest (17 min, 10% → 74%)
- Arrival: Rome
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aral Tankstelle Garmischer Straße (10 min, 22% → 46%)
-
Stop 2:
Hofer (17 min, 16% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
Garda Ovest (19 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 4:
Ristorante Goyo (12 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 5:
Area di Servizio Fabro Ovest (11 min, 10% → 39%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 36-minute advantage over Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 on this 1279km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 37min vs 1h 9min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~199 kWh vs ~223 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons