In our Prague to Rome EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 45 minutes, completing the 1307km route in 12h 52min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 12h 52min (45 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 43min
- Energy: ~240 kWh
- Distance: 1307km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
12h 52min |
13h 37min |
| Charging time: |
43min |
1h 23min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~235 kWh |
~231 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aral Tankstelle (10 min, 27% → 65%)
-
Stop 2:
Shell Tankstelle (11 min, 16% → 64%)
-
Stop 3:
Electra Old Wild West (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 4:
Osteria De'Giusti (12 min, 10% → 62%)
- Arrival: Rome
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Agip Tankstelle (10 min, 13% → 47%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Tankstelle Garmischer Straße (10 min, 23% → 54%)
-
Stop 3:
Hofer (13 min, 12% → 54%)
-
Stop 4:
Eni Paganella Ovest (10 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 5:
Electra Old Wild West (16 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 6:
Ristorante Goyo (13 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 7:
Area di Servizio Fabro Ovest (11 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 45-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1307km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 43min vs 1h 23min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons