In our Prague to Sofia EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the XPENG G9 RWD Long Range 2025 by 31 minutes, completing the 1296km route in 12h 39min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 12h 39min (31 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 44min
- Energy: ~212 kWh
- Distance: 1296km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
XPENG G9 RWD Long Range 2025 |
| Travel time |
12h 39min |
13h 10min |
| Charging time: |
44min |
56min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~233 kWh |
~232 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Bábolna (10 min, 19% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 28% → 69%)
-
Stop 3:
JP Putevi Srbije (24 min, 10% → 79%)
- Arrival: Sofia
XPENG G9 RWD Long Range 2025 Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Shell Ladná směr Bratislava (10 min, 41% → 88%)
-
Stop 2:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (10 min, 17% → 81%)
-
Stop 3:
Ledi MS (10 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 4:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (26 min, 11% → 49%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 31-minute advantage over XPENG G9 RWD Long Range 2025 on this 1296km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 44min vs 56min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~212 kWh vs ~255 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons