In our Prague to Sofia EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range by 62 minutes, completing the 1293km route in 12h 33min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 12h 33min (62 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 42min
- Energy: ~201 kWh
- Distance: 1293km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range |
| Travel time |
12h 33min |
13h 35min |
| Charging time: |
42min |
1h 43min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~233 kWh |
~233 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Shell Tópark (15 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 2:
Ledi MS (27 min, 10% → 86%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
ZSE Motor-Car Lamač (10 min, 14% → 50%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Bábolna (10 min, 20% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (21 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 4:
OMV smer Beograd (41 min, 10% → 86%)
-
Stop 5:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (21 min, 10% → 54%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 62-minute advantage over Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range on this 1293km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 42min vs 1h 43min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~201 kWh vs ~221 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons