In our Prague to Sofia EV duel, the Volvo EX60 P12 AWD Electric beats the Audi e-tron GT by 112 minutes, completing the 1301km route in 12h 17min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
Despite costing 34,060 less, the Volvo EX60 P12 AWD Electric beats the Audi e-tron GT by 112 minutes on this route.
The Volvo EX60 P12 AWD Electric needs only 2 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Volvo EX60 P12 AWD Electric
- Total time: 12h 17min (112 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 27min
- Energy: ~225 kWh
- Distance: 1301km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi e-tron GT |
Volvo EX60 P12 AWD Electric |
| Travel time |
14h 9min |
12h 17min |
| Charging time: |
1h 50min |
27min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
2 |
| Energy used |
~234 kWh |
~232 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi e-tron GT Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Teplárny Brno Olympia DC (10 min, 46% → 71%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Bábolna (12 min, 13% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (18 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 4:
OMV smer Beograd (15 min, 10% → 32%)
-
Stop 5:
JP Putevi Srbije (17 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 6:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (28 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 7:
Sheynovo (10 min, 10% → 14%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Volvo EX60 P12 AWD Electric Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (10 min, 14% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Ledi MS (17 min, 12% → 77%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Volvo EX60 P12 AWD Electric Won
The Volvo EX60 P12 AWD Electric achieved a 112-minute advantage over Audi e-tron GT on this 1301km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 27min vs 1h 50min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~225 kWh vs ~291 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons