In our Prague to Sofia EV duel, the Skoda ENYAQ 85 beats the Tesla Model S 2023 by 60 minutes, completing the 1294km route in 13h 35min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 8, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Tesla Model S 2023's 505km range doesn't beat the Skoda ENYAQ 85's 440km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Skoda ENYAQ 85 needs only 4 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Skoda ENYAQ 85
- Total time: 13h 35min (60 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 1h 44min
- Energy: ~226 kWh
- Distance: 1294km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Skoda ENYAQ 85 |
Tesla Model S 2023 |
| Travel time |
13h 35min |
14h 35min |
| Charging time: |
1h 44min |
1h 42min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~233 kWh |
~235 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Skoda ENYAQ 85 Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Győr (18 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (22 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 3:
OMV smer Beograd (43 min, 10% → 75%)
-
Stop 4:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (21 min, 10% → 48%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Tesla Model S 2023 Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
ZSE Motor-Car Mercedes-Benz (15 min, 29% → 50%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Auchan (36 min, 10% → 79%)
-
Stop 3:
OMV smer Beograd (19 min, 10% → 27%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger IKEA (16 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Bosphorus Hotel (16 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Skoda ENYAQ 85 Won
The Skoda ENYAQ 85 achieved a 60-minute advantage over Tesla Model S 2023 on this 1294km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~226 kWh vs ~243 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons