In our Prague to Vilnius EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 4 minutes, completing the 1129km route in 13h 10min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge's 363km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 4 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 13h 10min (4 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 1h 35min
- Energy: ~178 kWh
- Distance: 1129km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
13h 10min |
13h 14min |
| Charging time: |
1h 35min |
1h 31min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~203 kWh |
~202 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Citronex (23 min, 22% → 81%)
-
Stop 2:
MOP Guzew Południe (15 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
Biedronka Fabryczna (30 min, 10% → 87%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Rudniki Południe (27 min, 10% → 82%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Orlen Michałowice Południe (18 min, 14% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
MOP Guzew Południe (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 3:
MOP Mogiły (10 min, 19% → 53%)
-
Stop 4:
Kaufland (31 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 5:
Kaufland (22 min, 10% → 71%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 4-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1129km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~178 kWh vs ~187 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons