In our Riga to Amsterdam EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the MINI Cooper SE 2024 by 135 minutes, completing the 1692km route in 19h 6min. The key advantage? 9 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 14 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 19h 6min (135 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 3min
- Energy: ~276 kWh
- Distance: 1692km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
MINI Cooper SE 2024 |
| Travel time |
19h 6min |
21h 21min |
| Charging time: |
1h 3min |
3h 1min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
14 |
| Energy used |
~305 kWh |
~308 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Circle K (14 min, 57% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Olsze Południe (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
MOP Dopiewiec (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 4:
EnBW Schnellladepark (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 5:
Fastned Rastplatz Löwenburg (14 min, 10% → 68%)
- Arrival: Amsterdam
MINI Cooper SE 2024 Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Vilniaus (31 min, 10% → 74%)
-
Stop 2:
Lidl (15 min, 10% → 36%)
-
Stop 3:
Kaufland (11 min, 10% → 34%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Gajewo Zachód (16 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Żnin Zachód (11 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 6:
MOP Dopiewiec (12 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 7:
MOP Walewice (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 8:
Autohaus König (10 min, 15% → 45%)
-
Stop 9:
Circle K Autohof Ferch (10 min, 18% → 48%)
-
Stop 10:
Shell Recharge Euro Rastpark Irxleben/Hohenwarsleben (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 11:
McDonald's (11 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 12:
Fastned Rastplatz Löwenburg (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 13:
A.T.U (14 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 14:
Tango Vundelaar (10 min, 10% → 44%)
- Arrival: Amsterdam
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 135-minute advantage over MINI Cooper SE 2024 on this 1692km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 14 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 3min vs 3h 1min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons