In our Riga to Amsterdam EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the VW ID. Buzz Pro LR by 108 minutes, completing the 1692km route in 19h 6min. The key advantage? 6 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 19h 6min (108 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 3min
- Energy: ~276 kWh
- Distance: 1692km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
VW ID. Buzz Pro LR |
| Travel time |
19h 6min |
20h 54min |
| Charging time: |
1h 3min |
2h 49min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~305 kWh |
~306 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Circle K (14 min, 57% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Olsze Południe (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
MOP Dopiewiec (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 4:
EnBW Schnellladepark (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 5:
Fastned Rastplatz Löwenburg (14 min, 10% → 68%)
- Arrival: Amsterdam
VW ID. Buzz Pro LR Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Circle K (48 min, 38% → 85%)
-
Stop 2:
Kaufland (10 min, 10% → 22%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Olsze Południe (11 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 4:
Karczma Rzym (15 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Dopiewiec (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 6:
MOP Walewice (16 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 7:
Circle K Autohof Ferch (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 8:
Shell Recharge Euro Rastpark Irxleben/Hohenwarsleben (11 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 9:
KFC (13 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 10:
Allego Westfalen Tankstelle (15 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 11:
Tango Vundelaar (10 min, 10% → 38%)
- Arrival: Amsterdam
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 108-minute advantage over VW ID. Buzz Pro LR on this 1692km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 3min vs 2h 49min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~276 kWh vs ~374 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons