In our Riga to Athens EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi e-tron GT by 160 minutes, completing the 2815km route in 32h 3min. The key advantage? 6 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 13 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 32h 3min (160 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 2h 14min
- Energy: ~438 kWh
- Distance: 2815km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi e-tron GT |
| Travel time |
32h 3min |
34h 43min |
| Charging time: |
2h 14min |
4h 8min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
13 |
| Energy used |
~507 kWh |
~507 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (13 min, 32% → 57%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (14 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 3:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (23 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 4:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (12 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 5:
Ledi MS (27 min, 10% → 86%)
-
Stop 6:
Makpetrol A1 (17 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 7:
Korinos dir Athen (28 min, 10% → 87%)
- Arrival: Athens
Audi e-tron GT Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Cafe Baltica (10 min, 76% → 86%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (36 min, 10% → 79%)
-
Stop 3:
Factory Annopol (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Promna-Kolonia (14 min, 26% → 69%)
-
Stop 5:
HPC Volvo Aleja Powstańców Śląskich (12 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 6:
Tesco Teplická cesta (30 min, 10% → 82%)
-
Stop 7:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (14 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 8:
OMV Backa Topola jug (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 9:
Ledi MS (22 min, 13% → 77%)
-
Stop 10:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (28 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 11:
Makpetrol A1 (27 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 12:
Korinos dir Athen (18 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 13:
Shell (17 min, 10% → 64%)
- Arrival: Athens
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 160-minute advantage over Audi e-tron GT on this 2815km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 13 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 14min vs 4h 8min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~438 kWh vs ~630 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons