In our Riga to Belgrade EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the smart #1 Pro+ by 12 minutes, completing the 1712km route in 22h 6min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The smart #1 Pro+'s 340km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 8 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 22h 6min (12 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 2h 45min
- Energy: ~270 kWh
- Distance: 1712km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
smart #1 Pro+ |
| Travel time |
22h 6min |
22h 18min |
| Charging time: |
2h 45min |
2h 45min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~308 kWh |
~309 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Norfa XL (16 min, 18% → 43%)
-
Stop 2:
Kaufland (35 min, 10% → 94%)
-
Stop 3:
Factory Annopol (20 min, 10% → 69%)
-
Stop 4:
Shell MOP West (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 5:
Biedronka Połomskiego (14 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
OC Forum (36 min, 10% → 95%)
-
Stop 7:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (21 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 8:
OMV Backa Topola jug (13 min, 10% → 53%)
- Arrival: Belgrade
smart #1 Pro+ Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Norfa XL (20 min, 20% → 46%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (20 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 3:
Kaufland (16 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 4:
Factory Annopol (20 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 5:
Shell MOP West (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 6:
Biedronka Połomskiego (14 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 7:
Kaufland Wolkera (24 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 8:
Tesco (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 9:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (18 min, 19% → 68%)
-
Stop 10:
OMV Backa Topola jug (13 min, 10% → 52%)
- Arrival: Belgrade
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 12-minute advantage over smart #1 Pro+ on this 1712km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~270 kWh vs ~312 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons