In our Riga to Berlin EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 40 minutes, completing the 1052km route in 13h 59min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 5 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 13h 59min (40 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 20min
- Energy: ~166 kWh
- Distance: 1052km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
14h 39min |
13h 59min |
| Charging time: |
1h 58min |
1h 20min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~189 kWh |
~189 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Vilniaus (58 min, 14% → 90%)
-
Stop 2:
Biedronka (10 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 3:
Krauz Oil (18 min, 12% → 60%)
-
Stop 4:
OTO Park Handlowy (11 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Stacja Paliw WATIS (11 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 6:
Orlen Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 41%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Vilniaus (26 min, 19% → 85%)
-
Stop 2:
Biedronka (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 3:
Krauz Oil (13 min, 16% → 57%)
-
Stop 4:
OTO Park Handlowy (18 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 5:
Stacja Paliw Moya Rymarska (13 min, 10% → 52%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 40-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 1052km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 20min vs 1h 58min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~166 kWh vs ~178 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons