In our Riga to Bern EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the smart #1 Pro+ by 115 minutes, completing the 1951km route in 21h 46min. The key advantage? 6 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on August 14, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 13 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 21h 46min (115 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 15min
- Energy: ~318 kWh
- Distance: 1951km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
smart #1 Pro+ |
| Travel time |
21h 46min |
23h 41min |
| Charging time: |
1h 15min |
2h 59min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
13 |
| Energy used |
~351 kWh |
~352 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Circle K (14 min, 57% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Olsze Południe (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
MOP Dopiewiec (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Aral Autohof Niederlehme (10 min, 15% → 58%)
-
Stop 5:
mblty ROSI'S Autohof (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
Autohof Schwabach West (10 min, 17% → 60%)
-
Stop 7:
Empfinger Hof (10 min, 15% → 58%)
- Arrival: Bern
smart #1 Pro+ Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Vilniaus (40 min, 21% → 86%)
-
Stop 2:
Kaufland (10 min, 10% → 26%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Olsze Południe (14 min, 13% → 57%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Żnin Zachód (11 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Dopiewiec (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 6:
MOP Walewice (14 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 7:
Circle K Autohof Ferch (11 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 8:
Supercharger Leipzig Flughafen (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 9:
Frankenwald West (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 10:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle (12 min, 11% → 50%)
-
Stop 11:
BFS Business Fleet Services (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 12:
Sindelfinger Wald (11 min, 11% → 47%)
-
Stop 13:
Aral Tankstelle (15 min, 10% → 57%)
- Arrival: Bern
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 115-minute advantage over smart #1 Pro+ on this 1951km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 13 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 15min vs 2h 59min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~318 kWh vs ~356 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons