In our Riga to Bern EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the VW ID. Buzz Pro LR by 108 minutes, completing the 1951km route in 22h 6min. The key advantage? 6 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 13 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 22h 6min (108 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 35min
- Energy: ~358 kWh
- Distance: 1951km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
VW ID. Buzz Pro LR |
| Travel time |
22h 6min |
23h 54min |
| Charging time: |
1h 35min |
3h 14min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
13 |
| Energy used |
~351 kWh |
~352 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Rastplatz (29 min, 64% → 90%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Olsze Południe (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 3:
MOP Dopiewiec (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Aral Autohof Niederlehme (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 5:
mblty ROSI'S Autohof (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
Autohof Schwabach West (11 min, 12% → 61%)
-
Stop 7:
Empfinger Hof (10 min, 10% → 58%)
- Arrival: Bern
VW ID. Buzz Pro LR Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Circle K (48 min, 38% → 85%)
-
Stop 2:
Kaufland (10 min, 10% → 22%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Olsze Południe (11 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 4:
Karczma Rzym (15 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Dopiewiec (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 6:
MOP Walewice (16 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 7:
Circle K Autohof Ferch (12 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 8:
Supercharger Leipzig Flughafen (12 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 9:
Frankenwald West (10 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 10:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle (13 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 11:
BFS Business Fleet Services (10 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 12:
Sindelfinger Wald (11 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 13:
Aral Tankstelle (16 min, 10% → 52%)
- Arrival: Bern
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 108-minute advantage over VW ID. Buzz Pro LR on this 1951km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 13 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 35min vs 3h 14min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~358 kWh vs ~431 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons