In our Riga to Bratislava EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range by 28 minutes, completing the 1289km route in 14h 31min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 14h 31min (28 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 57min
- Energy: ~237 kWh
- Distance: 1289km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range |
| Travel time |
14h 31min |
14h 59min |
| Charging time: |
57min |
1h 27min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~232 kWh |
~232 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (21 min, 37% → 83%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Hotel Górski (14 min, 26% → 64%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Avion Shopping Park (12 min, 10% → 63%)
- Arrival: Bratislava
Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Cafe Baltica (10 min, 76% → 89%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (30 min, 11% → 81%)
-
Stop 3:
Factory Annopol (10 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 4:
Hotel Górski (10 min, 11% → 49%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Dobieszowice Zachód (15 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 6:
Signalbau (12 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Bratislava
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 28-minute advantage over Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range on this 1289km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 57min vs 1h 27min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons