In our Riga to Bratislava EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the smart #1 Pro+ by 15 minutes, completing the 1289km route in 15h 26min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The smart #1 Pro+'s 340km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 7 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 15h 26min (15 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 54min
- Energy: ~203 kWh
- Distance: 1289km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
smart #1 Pro+ |
| Travel time |
15h 26min |
15h 41min |
| Charging time: |
1h 54min |
1h 51min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~232 kWh |
~231 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Cafe Baltica (18 min, 72% → 100%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (34 min, 10% → 92%)
-
Stop 3:
Factory Annopol (13 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 4:
Hotel Górski (12 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Woźniki Zachód (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 6:
Uniwar P1 (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 7:
Signalbau (17 min, 10% → 62%)
- Arrival: Bratislava
smart #1 Pro+ Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Norfa XL (17 min, 20% → 42%)
-
Stop 2:
Kaufland (19 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 3:
Kaufland (16 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 4:
Factory Annopol (12 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 5:
Hotel Górski (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 6:
MOP Woźniki Zachód (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 7:
Uniwar P1 (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 8:
Signalbau (16 min, 12% → 61%)
- Arrival: Bratislava
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 15-minute advantage over smart #1 Pro+ on this 1289km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~203 kWh vs ~235 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons