In our Riga to Brussels EV duel, the BMW i5 eDrive40 beats the Tesla Model S 2023 by 240 minutes, completing the 1791km route in 20h 28min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Tesla Model S 2023's 505km range doesn't beat the BMW i5 eDrive40's 465km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The BMW i5 eDrive40 needs only 7 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
BMW i5 eDrive40
- Total time: 20h 28min (240 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 42min
- Energy: ~308 kWh
- Distance: 1791km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
BMW i5 eDrive40 |
Tesla Model S 2023 |
| Travel time |
20h 28min |
24h 28min |
| Charging time: |
1h 42min |
3h 53min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~322 kWh |
~333 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
BMW i5 eDrive40 Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Circle K (32 min, 49% → 81%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Olsze Południe (18 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 3:
MOP Dopiewiec (10 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 4:
Autohaus König (10 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Irxleben (10 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 6:
Fastned Rastplatz Löwenburg (11 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 7:
Shell Tankstelle Werstener Kreuz (11 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Brussels
Tesla Model S 2023 Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Rastplatz (35 min, 64% → 89%)
-
Stop 2:
Ford Gołębiewski (14 min, 10% → 20%)
-
Stop 3:
Hotel nad Wisłą & Gościniec (11 min, 10% → 20%)
-
Stop 4:
Hotel Port Kopytkowo (43 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 5:
Orlen A2 MOP Tulce (40 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
Aral Tankstelle Friedenstraße (22 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 7:
Supercharger Euro Rastpark Irxleben/Hohenwarsleben (12 min, 10% → 38%)
-
Stop 8:
Aral Tankstelle Wiesenau (31 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 9:
Aral Tankstelle Giesenheide (25 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Brussels
Why the BMW i5 eDrive40 Won
The BMW i5 eDrive40 achieved a 240-minute advantage over Tesla Model S 2023 on this 1791km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 42min vs 3h 53min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~308 kWh vs ~337 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons