In our Riga to Bucharest EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q4 Sportback 40 e-tron by 85 minutes, completing the 1802km route in 25h 53min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 25h 53min (85 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 2h 7min
- Energy: ~294 kWh
- Distance: 1802km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q4 Sportback 40 e-tron |
| Travel time |
25h 53min |
27h 18min |
| Charging time: |
2h 7min |
2h 55min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~324 kWh |
~324 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Kaufland (30 min, 31% → 88%)
-
Stop 2:
Biedronka Pogodna (10 min, 10% → 31%)
-
Stop 3:
Revia Park (33 min, 15% → 85%)
-
Stop 4:
Elektrozaryadka 200Kvt (23 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 5:
Kaufland Sucedava (31 min, 10% → 76%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Audi Q4 Sportback 40 e-tron Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (10 min, 25% → 51%)
-
Stop 2:
Biedronka Sikorskiego (14 min, 18% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Biedronka (10 min, 10% → 38%)
-
Stop 4:
Hotel & Restauracja Olivia (14 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 5:
Biedronka Legionów (11 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 6:
Audi Centre (62 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 7:
Maysternya Smaku (19 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 8:
Kaufland Sucedava (24 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 9:
Supercharger Galeria Mall (11 min, 10% → 40%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 85-minute advantage over Audi Q4 Sportback 40 e-tron on this 1802km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 7min vs 2h 55min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~294 kWh vs ~321 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons