In our Riga to Bucharest EV duel, the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q4 40 e-tron by 15 minutes, completing the 1803km route in 26h 46min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 26h 46min (15 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 2h 40min
- Energy: ~323 kWh
- Distance: 1803km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q4 40 e-tron |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
27h 1min |
26h 46min |
| Charging time: |
2h 51min |
2h 40min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~325 kWh |
~324 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q4 40 e-tron Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Jono Dailidės (24 min, 26% → 73%)
-
Stop 2:
Zajazd Orchidea (13 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 3:
Hotel & Restauracja Olivia (14 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 4:
Biedronka Legionów (11 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 5:
Audi Centre (60 min, 10% → 75%)
-
Stop 6:
Maysternya Smaku (17 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 7:
Kaufland Sucedava (22 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 8:
Supercharger Galeria Mall (10 min, 10% → 39%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Kaufland (23 min, 20% → 76%)
-
Stop 2:
Kaufland (10 min, 10% → 20%)
-
Stop 3:
Hotel & Restauracja Olivia (15 min, 11% → 51%)
-
Stop 4:
Biedronka Łaszczowiecka (44 min, 10% → 89%)
-
Stop 5:
Elektrozaryadka 200Kvt (28 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 6:
Kaufland Sucedava (40 min, 10% → 86%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Why the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 15-minute advantage over Audi Q4 40 e-tron on this 1803km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 40min vs 2h 51min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~323 kWh vs ~334 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons