In our Riga to Bucharest EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55 by 124 minutes, completing the 1802km route in 26h 36min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 26h 36min (124 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 2h 30min
- Energy: ~331 kWh
- Distance: 1802km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55 |
| Travel time |
26h 36min |
28h 40min |
| Charging time: |
2h 30min |
4h 30min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~324 kWh |
~325 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Kaufland (21 min, 22% → 74%)
-
Stop 2:
Kaufland (10 min, 10% → 20%)
-
Stop 3:
Hotel & Restauracja Olivia (14 min, 12% → 50%)
-
Stop 4:
Biedronka Łaszczowiecka (41 min, 10% → 87%)
-
Stop 5:
Elektrozaryadka 200Kvt (26 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 6:
Kaufland Sucedava (38 min, 10% → 84%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55 Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Jono Dailidės (41 min, 13% → 84%)
-
Stop 2:
Zajazd Orchidea (21 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 3:
Hotel & Restauracja Olivia (21 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 4:
Biedronka Legionów (15 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 5:
Audi Centre (96 min, 10% → 86%)
-
Stop 6:
Maysternya Smaku (28 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 7:
Kaufland Sucedava (34 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 8:
Supercharger Galeria Mall (14 min, 10% → 43%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 124-minute advantage over Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55 on this 1802km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 30min vs 4h 30min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~331 kWh vs ~398 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons