In our Riga to Bucharest EV duel, the Kia EV9 beats the Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55 by 78 minutes, completing the 1803km route in 27h 22min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55's 480km range doesn't beat the Kia EV9's 450km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Kia EV9 needs only 7 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Kia EV9
- Total time: 27h 22min (78 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 3h 30min
- Energy: ~381 kWh
- Distance: 1803km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55 |
Kia EV9 |
| Travel time |
28h 40min |
27h 22min |
| Charging time: |
4h 30min |
3h 30min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~325 kWh |
~327 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55 Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Jono Dailidės (41 min, 13% → 84%)
-
Stop 2:
Zajazd Orchidea (21 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 3:
Hotel & Restauracja Olivia (21 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 4:
Biedronka Legionów (15 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 5:
Audi Centre (96 min, 10% → 86%)
-
Stop 6:
Maysternya Smaku (28 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 7:
Kaufland Sucedava (34 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 8:
Supercharger Galeria Mall (14 min, 10% → 43%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Kia EV9 Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (10 min, 33% → 59%)
-
Stop 2:
Kaufland (12 min, 11% → 24%)
-
Stop 3:
Zajazd Orchidea (30 min, 10% → 79%)
-
Stop 4:
Biedronka Legionów (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 5:
Audi Centre (62 min, 16% → 71%)
-
Stop 6:
Maysternya Smaku (28 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 7:
Kaufland Sucedava (58 min, 10% → 88%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Why the Kia EV9 Won
The Kia EV9 achieved a 78-minute advantage over Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55 on this 1803km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 3h 30min vs 4h 30min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~381 kWh vs ~398 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons