In our Riga to Bucharest EV duel, the Mercedes-Benz EQA 250 beats the Kia EV9 by 59 minutes, completing the 1817km route in 26h 23min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Kia EV9's 450km range doesn't beat the Mercedes-Benz EQA 250's 395km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Mercedes-Benz EQA 250 needs only 6 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Mercedes-Benz EQA 250
- Total time: 26h 23min (59 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 2h 32min
- Energy: ~304 kWh
- Distance: 1817km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Kia EV9 |
Mercedes-Benz EQA 250 |
| Travel time |
27h 22min |
26h 23min |
| Charging time: |
3h 30min |
2h 32min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~327 kWh |
~359 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Kia EV9 Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (10 min, 33% → 59%)
-
Stop 2:
Kaufland (12 min, 11% → 24%)
-
Stop 3:
Zajazd Orchidea (30 min, 10% → 79%)
-
Stop 4:
Biedronka Legionów (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 5:
Audi Centre (62 min, 16% → 71%)
-
Stop 6:
Maysternya Smaku (28 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 7:
Kaufland Sucedava (58 min, 10% → 88%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Mercedes-Benz EQA 250 Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Jono Dailidės (21 min, 27% → 80%)
-
Stop 2:
Biedronka (32 min, 10% → 89%)
-
Stop 3:
Biedronka Witolda (19 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 4:
OMV Južná trieda (24 min, 10% → 69%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Oradea Shopping City (31 min, 10% → 85%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Prima Shopping Center (25 min, 10% → 72%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Why the Mercedes-Benz EQA 250 Won
The Mercedes-Benz EQA 250 achieved a 59-minute advantage over Kia EV9 on this 1817km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 32min vs 3h 30min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~304 kWh vs ~384 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons