In our Riga to Copenhagen EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 46 minutes, completing the 1278km route in 18h 44min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 8, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 18h 44min (46 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 8min
- Energy: ~235 kWh
- Distance: 1278km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
18h 44min |
19h 30min |
| Charging time: |
1h 8min |
1h 57min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~230 kWh |
~230 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Circle K (18 min, 51% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
Biedronka (10 min, 10% → 31%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell (10 min, 30% → 67%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Stacja Paliw WATIS (10 min, 17% → 60%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Nordoel (10 min, 12% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
Væggerløsevej (10 min, 18% → 60%)
- Arrival: Copenhagen
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Circle K (49 min, 34% → 88%)
-
Stop 2:
Biedronka (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 3:
Krauz Oil (11 min, 18% → 54%)
-
Stop 4:
OTO Park Handlowy (15 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 5:
Biedronka Nowokarsiborska (11 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 6:
Lindholz (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 7:
Væggerløsevej (11 min, 11% → 49%)
- Arrival: Copenhagen
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 46-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1278km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 8min vs 1h 57min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons