In our Riga to London EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi e-tron 55 by 117 minutes, completing the 2131km route in 24h 4min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 24h 4min (117 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 20min
- Energy: ~348 kWh
- Distance: 2131km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi e-tron 55 |
| Travel time |
24h 4min |
26h 1min |
| Charging time: |
1h 20min |
3h 19min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~384 kWh |
~384 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Circle K (14 min, 57% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Olsze Południe (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
MOP Dopiewiec (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Aral Autohof Niederlehme (10 min, 15% → 58%)
-
Stop 5:
Shell Tankstelle Hämelerwald (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 6:
toom Baumarkt (12 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 7:
Diksmuidestraat (10 min, 10% → 57%)
- Arrival: London
Audi e-tron 55 Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Vilniaus (32 min, 24% → 95%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Olsze Południe (30 min, 10% → 86%)
-
Stop 3:
MOP Dopiewiec (23 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 4:
Aral Autohof Niederlehme (22 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 5:
Fastned Rastplatz Uhry Nord (15 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 6:
Fastned Rastplatz Löwenburg (22 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 7:
McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 8:
Fastned De Beerze (12 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 9:
Lukoil Kortrijksesteenweg (15 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 10:
ENGIE Eurotunnel Main Terminal (18 min, 10% → 59%)
- Arrival: London
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 117-minute advantage over Audi e-tron 55 on this 2131km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 20min vs 3h 19min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~348 kWh vs ~525 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons