In our Riga to London EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi S6 Avant e-tron by 15 minutes, completing the 2131km route in 24h 4min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 24h 4min (15 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 20min
- Energy: ~348 kWh
- Distance: 2131km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi S6 Avant e-tron |
| Travel time |
24h 4min |
24h 19min |
| Charging time: |
1h 20min |
1h 35min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~384 kWh |
~384 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Circle K (14 min, 57% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Olsze Południe (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
MOP Dopiewiec (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Aral Autohof Niederlehme (10 min, 15% → 58%)
-
Stop 5:
Shell Tankstelle Hämelerwald (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 6:
toom Baumarkt (12 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 7:
Diksmuidestraat (10 min, 10% → 57%)
- Arrival: London
Audi S6 Avant e-tron Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Rastplatz (23 min, 66% → 87%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Olsze Południe (12 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 3:
MOP Dopiewiec (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Aral Autohof Niederlehme (10 min, 12% → 56%)
-
Stop 5:
Fastned Rastplatz Uhry Nord (10 min, 14% → 58%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Euro Rastpark (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 7:
Fastned De Beerze (10 min, 12% → 56%)
-
Stop 8:
Fastned Oostendse Baan (10 min, 19% → 62%)
- Arrival: London
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 15-minute advantage over Audi S6 Avant e-tron on this 2131km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 20min vs 1h 35min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~348 kWh vs ~387 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons