In our Riga to London EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Audi Q4 40 e-tron by 70 minutes, completing the 2130km route in 24h 27min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 8 charging stops compared to 12 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 24h 27min (70 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 1h 47min
- Energy: ~391 kWh
- Distance: 2130km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q4 40 e-tron |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
25h 37min |
24h 27min |
| Charging time: |
2h 56min |
1h 47min |
| Charging stops: |
12 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~383 kWh |
~383 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q4 40 e-tron Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Circle K (29 min, 45% → 77%)
-
Stop 2:
Kaufland (10 min, 10% → 22%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Olsze Południe (13 min, 12% → 48%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Żnin Zachód (11 min, 10% → 35%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Dopiewiec (17 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
Autohaus König (20 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 7:
Aral Tankstelle (14 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 8:
Fastned Rastplatz Löwenburg (14 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 9:
Shell Tankstelle Grothusstraße (12 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 10:
Fastned De Beerze (10 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 11:
Lukoil Kortrijksesteenweg (12 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 12:
Supercharger Eurotunnel Flexiplus Lounge (14 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: London
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Rastplatz (29 min, 64% → 90%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Olsze Południe (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 3:
MOP Dopiewiec (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Aral Autohof Niederlehme (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Fastned Rastplatz Uhry Nord (11 min, 11% → 61%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Euro Rastpark (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 7:
Fastned De Beerze (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 8:
Lukoil Kortrijksesteenweg (14 min, 29% → 76%)
- Arrival: London
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 70-minute advantage over Audi Q4 40 e-tron on this 2130km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 12 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 47min vs 2h 56min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~391 kWh vs ~394 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons