In our Riga to London EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Audi e-tron GT by 67 minutes, completing the 2128km route in 24h 27min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 8 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 24h 27min (67 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 1h 47min
- Energy: ~391 kWh
- Distance: 2128km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Audi e-tron GT |
| Travel time |
24h 27min |
25h 34min |
| Charging time: |
1h 47min |
2h 53min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~383 kWh |
~383 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Rastplatz (29 min, 64% → 90%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Olsze Południe (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 3:
MOP Dopiewiec (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Aral Autohof Niederlehme (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Fastned Rastplatz Uhry Nord (11 min, 11% → 61%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Euro Rastpark (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 7:
Fastned De Beerze (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 8:
Lukoil Kortrijksesteenweg (14 min, 29% → 76%)
- Arrival: London
Audi e-tron GT Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Circle K (43 min, 40% → 82%)
-
Stop 2:
Kaufland (10 min, 10% → 21%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Olsze Południe (24 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Dopiewiec (13 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 5:
Autohaus König (16 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 6:
Aral Tankstelle (12 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 7:
Fastned Rastplatz Löwenburg (12 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 8:
Shell Tankstelle Grothusstraße (10 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 9:
Fastned De Beerze (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 10:
Lukoil Kortrijksesteenweg (10 min, 14% → 49%)
-
Stop 11:
ENGIE Eurotunnel Main Terminal (13 min, 11% → 54%)
- Arrival: London
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 67-minute advantage over Audi e-tron GT on this 2128km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 47min vs 2h 53min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~391 kWh vs ~476 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons