In our Riga to London EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Tesla Model S 2023 by 277 minutes, completing the 2128km route in 24h 27min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 8 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 24h 27min (277 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 1h 47min
- Energy: ~391 kWh
- Distance: 2128km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Tesla Model S 2023 |
| Travel time |
24h 27min |
29h 4min |
| Charging time: |
1h 47min |
4h 28min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~383 kWh |
~395 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Rastplatz (29 min, 64% → 90%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Olsze Południe (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 3:
MOP Dopiewiec (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Aral Autohof Niederlehme (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Fastned Rastplatz Uhry Nord (11 min, 11% → 61%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Euro Rastpark (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 7:
Fastned De Beerze (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 8:
Lukoil Kortrijksesteenweg (14 min, 29% → 76%)
- Arrival: London
Tesla Model S 2023 Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Rastplatz (35 min, 64% → 89%)
-
Stop 2:
Ford Gołębiewski (14 min, 10% → 20%)
-
Stop 3:
Hotel nad Wisłą & Gościniec (11 min, 10% → 20%)
-
Stop 4:
Hotel Port Kopytkowo (43 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 5:
Orlen A2 MOP Tulce (40 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
Aral Tankstelle Friedenstraße (22 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 7:
Supercharger Euro Rastpark Irxleben/Hohenwarsleben (15 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 8:
Autohof Bantorf (33 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 9:
Aral Tankstelle (29 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 10:
Supercharger Hotel Weinebrugge (26 min, 10% → 69%)
- Arrival: London
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 277-minute advantage over Tesla Model S 2023 on this 2128km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 47min vs 4h 28min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~391 kWh vs ~400 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons